Why does it feel so wrong for me? I honestly do not know exactly but I have a theory. I think it has to do with the fact that his name was given and used when it was a "free human being" - equal towards other humans. Today it is no longer free. It is enslaved, belongs to me and gets trained as well as used by Superiors.
It is no longer a man - yes it is male but no man. It is a slave, a bitch, an object, a pet, livestock and definitely inferior towards Superiors Does this make it less worth? NO! On the contrary - for me it is more worth then anything else in the world. That is because I need a slave in my life to be truly happy and fulfilled. I want that it embraces its status. That it is proud of what it is and that it lives its true being! I am blessed to have found it. There is nothing bad in being an inferior! As there is nothing bad of being be an Superior. It is a symbiosys and both need each other.
Nevertheless because of that it feels wrong for me when people of the BDSM community uses his first name.
If you have any question or comments about this post let me know in the comment below
or Tweet to @MasterHusband
Find us also on Twitter: Follow @MasterHusband and Follow @GaySlaveHusband
or visit Master D´s website
Blogentry #244
2 comments:
SIR, it has the BDSM handle of alphadog, SIR, and it in non-BDSM and BDSM responds to being addressed as “alpha“, SIR, what is YOUR preferred handle for YOUR husband/slave, SIR?
Some Masters would argue that you should address your slave by name so that there is no difference between the Master-slave world and the external world. It reminds the slave that it is living the real world all the time. My preference is to address a slave by its surname, so that it continues to make a connection to reality but reinforces the hierarchy of Master and slave.
Post a Comment